4 ms·
I expect to be downvoted for this but I think there is an appeal in an institution that dogmaticaly upholds a "higher" ideal of human behavior. They try to prov
by russellendicott 6y ago
I expect to be downvoted for this but I think there is an appeal in an institution that dogmaticaly upholds a "higher" ideal of human behavior. They try to provide us with an example of how a hypothetical family with essentially unlimited resources that is born into this world with a social duty should theoretically behave. They also show us constant examples that human emotions are a factor regardless of your socio-economic situation. This provides the layman with an answer to the question "what would I do if I won the lottery and was instantly vaulted into the highest social circle?" Would you use your influence for the good of the people while maintaining a scandalous affair? Would you fall into the same emotional traps as the royals?
I think it's an interesting social experiment that may be worth the cost it requires to maintain.
- guiriduro 6y agoAnd then there's Prince Andrew.
- salawat 6y agoWhat you describe is noblis oblige. It's a long standing cultural force ofarguable efficacy peculiar in particular to France/Britain. Elsewhere, there are alternative viewpoints. The funny thing is that your proposed institution assumes the layman is the one who needs to be taught or reminded more often than not.
- russellendicott 6y agoThanks for letting me know what the proper term is. I think it's very interesting.