> First of all, how can a belt contain drugs? I suppose there are some Amazon sellers who have specific items that (contrary to the public listing) actually co

> First of all, how can a belt contain drugs? I suppose there are some Amazon sellers who have specific items that (contrary to the public listing) actually contain drugs. In that case, people could order them as a way of buying drugs that would look like some other kind of retail business from the point of view of Amazon, shippers, and tax agencies. The seller could try to make the listed product extremely unappealing or uninteresting to the general public, or have some kind of code or out-of-band contact method that people could use to indicate that they wanted and expected specific orders to contain the drugs instead of the listed item. Also https://xkcd.com/325/ https://xkcd.com/325/ Also, it looks like the "people lying in order to harm, steal from, or extort others" issue hasn't been solved for any side of a two-sided market or review system. :-( Edit: I was first thinking of saying that this is a way that drug prohibition really empowers random people to hurt each other with false accusations. But this is probably true for any kind of high-stakes accusation. As long as there's any kind of contraband or dangerous item that Amazon cares quite a bit about banning from its site, and as long as there's a significant market in that item, people could make spurious accusations that any seller was secretly trading in it.