4 ms·
The purpose is to prevent revenue loss by the recording company who could host their own public event (or selling rights thereof). It would be an impossible ar
by koheripbal 6y ago
The purpose is to prevent revenue loss by the recording company who could host their own public event (or selling rights thereof). It would be an impossible argument to make that the police (or anyone) playing a song on their phone is reducing the ability of the record company from gaining revenues from hosting their own local event.
- BLKNSLVR 6y agoAnd yet filming a police officer who's playing a copyrighted tune, and uploading it to Youtube results in a take-down. I don't think many folks are going to YouTube to listen to music from a filmed phone. "reducing the ability of the record company from gaining revenues"
- pfortuny 6y agoWell, that is the difference between the rule of law (there are tribunals for deciding whether the police are breaking the law or not) and the rule of incorporated companies: you are screwed if they decide it...
- koheripbal 6y agoThe difference is that Google can do whatever it wants because it is a private company. Misapplying the law because a private company does something is not a logical argument.
- talaketu 6y agoIt's not really about the purpose - it's about the rights. And it's rights in the plural - not just right to revenue - but also the exclusive right to public performance.
- acoard 6y agoThe author of the first public drinking law, in 1979, said on the law's purpose: >"We do not recklessly expect the police to give a summons to a Con Ed worker having a beer with his lunch". [0] Yet today, if you have a beer in the park at lunch you will get ticketed, or at least a warning. The lesson? Do not rely on discretion and restraint to make up for an overly expansive letter-of-the-law. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_laws_of_New_York#cite_note-Quindlen-17 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_laws_of_New_York#cite_...
- koheripbal 6y agoAre you making the argument that because the public alcohol ban is misused, that therefor we should also misuse this copyright law?
- talaketu 6y agoThey are pointing out that the codified law is applicable, not what you claim was the original purpose. (I don't agree with you that the original purpose was restricted to protecting revenue. The original purpose of copyright law is to codify the moral rights associated with creative works. Moral rights are fundamentally a property right connecting the work to the person. When we hear that an artist tries to prevent their works being distorted by being associated with a certain political campaign, this is an appeal to this kind of right, not revenue.)