6 ms·
The inconsistent positions enumerated in the McWhorter piece should not be taken as disparate positions of different people. To claim that it is seems to amoun
by tanseydavid 6y ago
The inconsistent positions enumerated in the McWhorter piece should not be taken as disparate positions of different people.
To claim that it is seems to amount to arguing in bad faith.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> The inconsistent positions enumerated in the McWhorter piece should not be taken as disparate positions of different people. In the case where both views presented exist at all, I see no evidence (and McWhorter certainly presents none) that, outside of two where there is no internal conflict in the first place, they exist in any significnace other than as as disparate positions of different people. Given that, why would I take them as anything else?