I was gonna say: isn't that just the MIT license? But then I saw this: > The person recognizes Mars as a free planet and that no Earth-based government has aut

I was gonna say: isn't that just the MIT license? But then I saw this: > The person recognizes Mars as a free planet and that no Earth-based government has authority or sovereignty over Martian activities. Yeah... Thanks... As much as I (and much of the world's countries[0]) may agree with you, now I can't use the code, even in an MIT licensed library or program. Look, I get why people do this: it's cute, fun, or whatever, but please: don't. It makes it impossible for those of us to use a library legally. Sure, most won't care, and I'm sure the author won't enforce it, but it doesn't matter. A corporation's legal team is going to deny any attempts to use software with licenses like this. Take, for example, the JSON license[1]. It contains this: > The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil. Who decides what "good" is? Crockford? Me? Is Google evil? They say they're not, but some think they are. Who's right? It's a legal conundrum that makes things harder than they should be. This blog post[2] explains this license's line's problems better. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_Space_Treaty [1]: http://www.json.org/license.html http://www.json.org/license.html [1-alt]: https://spdx.org/licenses/JSON.html https://spdx.org/licenses/JSON.html [2]: https://www.synopsys.com/blogs/software-security/json-license-limitations/ https://www.synopsys.com/blogs/software-security/json-licens...