5 ms·
I am 100% for accountability in policing, but I find it telling the number of these kinds of videos that don't show the full context and are instead 30s clips o
by JadoJodo 6y ago
I am 100% for accountability in policing, but I find it telling the number of these kinds of videos that don't show the full context and are instead 30s clips of the middle/worst part of the interaction.
- katsura 6y agoHe actually has a 5 minutes long video about the first interaction: https://www.instagram.com/p/CLCpHBQjX8r/ https://www.instagram.com/p/CLCpHBQjX8r/
- tclancy 6y agoWhat is the point of this comment if you don't back it with receipts? The videos are available, you could make the effort to find out but chose to post this instead.
- stale2002 6y agoWell his point was probably to reference these videos, so you can go look it up yourself if you are interested. Not every comment has to be a multi page long essay. Instead, merely telling people that something exists is useful, so people can search for it later. If you really care so much, then you should feel free to find then yourself.
- account42 6y agoThe police can always release the full recording from their side if they think there is context that is missing.
- Cthulhu_ 6y agoThe 30 second clip is to provoke outrage and I guess clicks; the full recording is evidence in a court of law. DMCA will not apply then. I think it's perfectly acceptable to collect your own evidence when it comes to interactions with the police or anything that may end up in a court of law. Which is why it's kinda weird that where I live, you can't use security camera footage from inside your own house if you haven't clearly warned about security cameras being present. Even burglars get privacy protection, apparently.