3 ms·
> they lose their copyright altogether Big no to this, as that can and would be abused by scavengers, but the rest is sane and broadly agreed to be the way. W
by theelous3 6y ago
> they lose their copyright altogether
Big no to this, as that can and would be abused by scavengers, but the rest is sane and broadly agreed to be the way.
What tou want instead is fines by revenue / income.
- jedberg 6y ago> Big no to this, as that can and would be abused by scavengers How would scavengers abuse this?
- theelous3 6y agoYou hold a copyright I want. I fraudulently pose as you and make dcma claims until you lose your copyright.
- joshuaissac 6y agoA solution is to require that the DMCA notice contains proof of ownership of the copyright (or proof that you are acting as an agent of the verified copyright holder).
- jedberg 6y agoBut if all copyrights required registration, then all the notices would have to go along with that registration. You'd have to commit identity theft, which is a separate crime that you would be prosecuted for.