First of all, the judgement was because the guy never showed up for court. He might have won if he did. More importantly, he called it a scam, and it isn't cle

First of all, the judgement was because the guy never showed up for court. He might have won if he did. More importantly, he called it a scam, and it isn't clear that that is a lie. He alleges that he paid for work, but they just rephrased the documents he gave them. Why wouldn't that be a scam?