3 ms·
> What’s the proof of that? I.e. there is no evidence, anywhere that they do this. I don’t need to prove a negative. If you’re accusing them of something, pr
by zepto 6y ago
> What’s the proof of that?
I.e. there is no evidence, anywhere that they do this.
I don’t need to prove a negative. If you’re accusing them of something, provide evidence, otherwise this is just innuendo.
Secondly, even if they do have enough data to infer something about user behavior across websites and third party apps in some future in which we discover they were lying, that isn’t the same thing as intentionally tracking people across websites using explicit identifiers today.
It’s worth pointing out that they are aware of the inference problem and we know they sanitize their logs to alleviate it e.g. by anonymizing IP
addresses etc before storage, although we also can reasonably guess that they haven’t achieved this universally yet.
> Now you may say that some data collection is unavoidable given the nature of the device (eg push messaging) but that’s often also true of other company’s products.
This is true, but irrelevant.
Apple discloses what they collect, and there is no double standard in what they are asking others to do.
It’s the claim of a double standard that is complete bullshit.
- cromwellian 6y agoIs there a privacy nutrition label published for how the App Store or Push services use data? How do they use information about what apps I’ve purchased, used, or rated? Or my App Store search queries?
- zepto 6y agoYes. There is a very detailed disclosure presented each time you opt-in to collection of these things. If you are actually an Apple user, you have clicked these away. Much more intrusive than just a label in the store. I do agree that placeholders should be put in the store, even for the store itself, to allow people to see the information in the same format.