> This article is the very definition of a straw man. Absolutely no one subscribes to the position it critiques. The article critiques a position that consists

> This article is the very definition of a straw man. Absolutely no one subscribes to the position it critiques. The article critiques a position that consists of multiple beliefs. While it is true that ~nobody subscribes to all of them, each individual belief is very well-represented amongst the "anti-racists." As a consequence, to anyone under attack by a Twitter mob, the situation looks exactly as McWhorter describes: you're being hit from all directions by the entire span of mutually contradictory nonsense.