3 ms·
Doesn't sound like you're out of your depth. It's been done with a worse receiver - https://www.rtl-sdr.com/detecting-pulsars-rotating-neutron-stars-with-an-rt
by jcims 6y ago
Doesn't sound like you're out of your depth. It's been done with a worse receiver - https://www.rtl-sdr.com/detecting-pulsars-rotating-neutron-stars-with-an-rtl-sdr/ https://www.rtl-sdr.com/detecting-pulsars-rotating-neutron-s...
- _Microft 6y agoWell, I am a physicist, so this wasn't purely techno-babble but since I never had anything to do with astronomy or radio-observations a caveat seemed warranted. Thanks for the link btw!
- hanslub42 6y agoWorse receiver, but better antenna: From the linked article: "... With their system [...] they were able to estimate that the minimum dish aperture required to observe the Vela pulsar would be 6m, noting that the Vela pulsar is probably the strongest pulsar ever detected" As a kid, I built a crystal radio. There it was the same: with a very long wire, even such a simple radio could receive far-away stations