Do you think it is understandable that someone might know all of the facts of the suit and still consider it a farcical lawsuit, if not a textbook example of on

Do you think it is understandable that someone might know all of the facts of the suit and still consider it a farcical lawsuit, if not a textbook example of one? I ask because those facts are often presented with the presumption that the person crying frivolousness hasn't considered them before forming his opinion.