3 ms·
Not the OP, but well regarded philosophy journals (in my academic neck of the woods) have ridiculously low acceptance rates (2-3% often), and in general peer re
by Schiphol 6y ago
Not the OP, but well regarded philosophy journals (in my academic neck of the woods) have ridiculously low acceptance rates (2-3% often), and in general peer review is done and taken seriously.
- _qulr 6y ago> well regarded philosophy journals (in my academic neck of the woods) have ridiculously low acceptance rates (2-3% often) This just shows that academic philosophy is a very exclusive club. It doesn't say anything about the standards involved. If anything, an extremely high rejection rate tends to enforce intellectual conformity and conservatism on a field that you would think is least in need of those qualities.
- Schiphol 6y agoIt definitely looks like standards from the inside :)
- _qulr 6y agoOh yes, I agree!
- ntsplnkv2 6y agoIt stands to reason that most papers will not be impressive, so even if the filter is biased it likely has some sort of value. It's always a balancing act. Become too restrictive and good ideas could get snuffed out, but too open and it's just a giant cluster of bad ideas and too much noise.