That's true. But it doesn't matter in this context because Greenwald's writing pattern strongly supports my argument. Look at his Pulitzer-winning stories in th

That's true. But it doesn't matter in this context because Greenwald's writing pattern strongly supports my argument. Look at his Pulitzer-winning stories in the Guardian, or his stories based on leaks in Brazil that revealed government corruption written at the Intercept. He didn't casually string insults throughout those stories-- he let the revelations speak for themselves. And honestly, why would any sane investigative journalist would want to distract from a breaking story with a bunch of facile name-calling? If for some reason Greenwald wants to write like that in a future on some similarly groundbreaking exclusive as the Snowden leaks were, I guess I'll have to reassess.