3 ms·
The defendant wasn't present, so the plaintiff's assertions about damages will presumably have been taken at face value. IANAL
by pacaro 6y ago
The defendant wasn't present, so the plaintiff's assertions about damages will presumably have been taken at face value. IANAL
- evgen 6y agoIf you read the actual case it turns out that the judge did not allow one of the two damages claims, so it was not just a case of whatever the plaintiff wanted they received.