4 ms·
Incidentally and apropos to the subject at hand, McNeil's apology is a pretty good one: “I was asked at a dinner by a student whether I thought a classmate of
by yosamino 6y ago
Incidentally and apropos to the subject at hand, McNeil's apology is a pretty good one:
“I was asked at a dinner by a student whether I thought a classmate of hers should have been suspended for a video she had made as a 12-year-old in which she used a racial slur. To understand what was in the video, I asked if she had called someone else the slur or whether she was rapping or quoting a book title. In asking the question, I used the slur itself,” McNeil said in his note to the staff. “I should not have done that. Originally, I thought the context in which I used this ugly word could be defended. I now realize that it cannot. It is deeply offensive and hurtful. The fact that I even thought I could defend it itself showed extraordinarily bad judgment. For that I apologize.”
https://www.thewrap.com/ny-times-reporter-donald-mcneil-jr-ousted-after-using-n-word-with-students/ https://www.thewrap.com/ny-times-reporter-donald-mcneil-jr-o...
- enriquto 6y agoIt's not a good apology. It's a sad surrendering of one's dignity to appease an angry mob.
- seoulbran 6y agoExactly. Keep up the good fight. The well-intentioned like yosamino are blindly walking off the cliff.
- yosamino 6y agoYou did notice that I specifically commented on the structure of the apology wrt to the contents of the article - not about it's neccessity ? > good fight. Good fight for what specifically ?