> disrespect igor by dismissing his arguments due to his tone, which handily allows you to ignore his content, such as it is I didn't dismiss his argument; I s

> disrespect igor by dismissing his arguments due to his tone, which handily allows you to ignore his content, such as it is I didn't dismiss his argument; I said that he was correct right after he posted: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26073488 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26073488 "That's not the point" can be interpreted as respectful, but it also can be interpreted as argumentative. I chose to assume good intentions, but I offered a different phrasing that would have a higher chance of not being misinterpreted: i.e. using "yes and" instead of "no but": https://www.theheretic.org/2017/yes-and-vs-no-but/ https://www.theheretic.org/2017/yes-and-vs-no-but/