4 ms·
I don't see any benefit to having this terminology, other than as a pretext for censorship. Calling it "mal" information implies that truthful information can b
by apostacy 6y ago
I don't see any benefit to having this terminology, other than as a pretext for censorship. Calling it "mal" information implies that truthful information can be bad. Calling it something more neutral like "unfiltered" or "unabashed" would be more accurate.