3 ms·
Assuming that there are some actions that it is morally just to punish, if not the individual's ability to exert free will to avoid them, then what (in your min
by ridaj 6y ago
Assuming that there are some actions that it is morally just to punish, if not the individual's ability to exert free will to avoid them, then what (in your mind) sets apart those actions from those that it is not morally just to punish?
Or are you making the claim that it is never morally justified for any action to be punished?
- throwaway2-718 6y ago>Or are you making the claim that it is never morally justified for any action to be punished? I'm sorry, but are you terminally stupid? Of course they didn't make that claim, that's why the choose the example of Nachos.