5 ms·
I haven't tried it but https://www.keycloak.org/ https://www.keycloak.org/ (by redhat) seems close to what you describe.
by SahAssar 6y ago
I haven't tried it but https://www.keycloak.org/ https://www.keycloak.org/ (by redhat) seems close to what you describe.
- digaozao 6y agoI have been using it for a year. No problems so far, and found it to be really flexible
- TedDoesntTalk 6y agoKeycloak FTW. Been using it for 18 months now in production.
- afrodc_ 6y agoKeycloak is great and pretty extensible on a per basis need.
- mamcx 6y agoI have found confusing then support for multi-tenants and your own auth tables (ie: put the auth tables in the schema of each tenant?) across the board. Exist one project where I can do both?
- znpy 6y agokeycloak is great, it's very flexible and fairly lightweight (all things considered). it can get a bit complex, but to be fair the whole oauth/oauth2.0/openid/openid-connect/saml is quite messy in general.
- aryamaan 6y agoVery tangent question but someone could help as the discussion is about Keycloak. In particular, I am trying to solve the problem of how I can share client secrets (so they can generate access token using it) with the respective clients. I don't want to share them over email/ password protected doc. I tried making one client for each realm and adding one user to it. When I login via user account using GUI, I am unable to see any info related to clients. What am I doing wrong here? What are the good practices around this? Thanks kind folks