Uuuugggh... no, license proliferation BAD. Seriously, did the world need yet another Copyleft license? Is there something they couldn't find in the GPL, MPL, et

Uuuugggh... no, license proliferation BAD. Seriously, did the world need yet another Copyleft license? Is there something they couldn't find in the GPL, MPL, etc? And "For a limited time, husky 5 will be released under License Zero's Parity License. It will be MIT again later." What the heck? Who wants to use a project without a (relatively) stable license? To me, this is muddying the waters and making things confusing for no real reason. IF I were a Husky user, I'd probably drop it at this point. I'm sure they have good intentions behind this move, but from a more pragmatic standpoint, this just doesn't seem like a desirable thing to me.