3 ms·
I don't see how this rates as abhorrent.
by tootie 6y ago
I don't see how this rates as abhorrent.
- throwaway894345 6y agoI thought it sufficed to say that overt defamation is abhorrent, at least when one is a journalist at the newspaper of record.
- tootie 6y agoDefamation implies intent.
- throwaway894345 6y agoI find it impossible to believe that it's a simple coincidence that a professional journalist mistakenly accused Andreesen of using a slur (couldn't be bothered to do the most basic fact checking?) to her 200K followers after she ranted on Twitter for months about him blocking her. I think you're missing a lot of context with respect to her behavior on Twitter prior to her making her account private.