>It should be possible to have a legitimate conversation of whether or not Lorenz is correct about Andreesen, and whether or not the accusation constitutes beha

>It should be possible to have a legitimate conversation of whether or not Lorenz is correct about Andreesen, and whether or not the accusation constitutes behavior that should be condemned. You don't give equal weight to blatant lies. There's no legitimate conversation to be had on this topic other than to point out the blatant lies, attempted character assassination based on fabrication, and complete abandonment of any shred of journalistic integrity or standards. You don't give legitimacy to clear malevolent liars by arguing their points as if they are valid.