But what if the subject deserves snark and derision? I don't like to 'both sides' it and claim neutrality/impartiality when one side is wrong, or "more wronger"

But what if the subject deserves snark and derision? I don't like to 'both sides' it and claim neutrality/impartiality when one side is wrong, or "more wronger" than the other. I didn't find anything atrocious or objectionable in the article myself, but I'm probably an oddity. 25+ years of online discourse has jaded me. :)