> he's never been very adept at objectivity or impartiality. > I'm honestly surprised more folks haven't seen through his shtick yet In these you attack the a

> he's never been very adept at objectivity or impartiality. > I'm honestly surprised more folks haven't seen through his shtick yet In these you attack the author rather his points. Being hard to read for you doesn't discredit the article's arguments either. I'd rather hear what you dislike about the points being made rather than how they read, because the former is more important to having an actual conversation.