> No. Those are subject to NDA Yeah, that's what I thought and why I settled for a less accurate comparison. > I think it's exciting I think it's exciting, t

> No. Those are subject to NDA Yeah, that's what I thought and why I settled for a less accurate comparison. > I think it's exciting I think it's exciting, too. The extent of my claims is "no, this does not mean 100GHz LN2 CPUs in a few years." I did not intend these remarks to be meaningful to chip designers, only to CPU consumers who see "GHz" and think "CPU clock speeds." The leverage of having a slightly better fundamental device is extraordinary. We should spare no expense looking for them and leave no stone unturned.