> They should choose between the donors and the billionaires then Why? They have absolutely no reason to do that. They have a mission, they are raising money f

> They should choose between the donors and the billionaires then Why? They have absolutely no reason to do that. They have a mission, they are raising money for that mission, and doing so very successfully. > (regardless, they are a tech company, they could employ people remotely) Could, and they know that, and they make hiring decisions based on their expertise and knowledge, and have deciided the organisation is better off hiring some people in SF. > This still does not address the issue of the dishonest fundraising though (pretending that they need your help despite making 1/10th of their wage and not saying up-front on what they spend the money on) I understand that you had a misunderstanding about what wikipedia is, how their community management works, and that you didn't make use of the public, publicised resources that make their spending completely transparent. That doesn't make them dishonest, it makes you lazy.