Sure, but most of that introductory post was about service management, and mount management, which are two areas the init system was traditionally heavily invol

Sure, but most of that introductory post was about service management, and mount management, which are two areas the init system was traditionally heavily involved in. Sure, the init system might not technically have concerned itself with either, but a lot of the ordering considerations were very heavily concerned with both of those. Now, no one will argue that systemd's service management capabilities far exceed what most historical init systems did. Heck, the traditional init system had interior service management to window's Service Control Manager implementation, since the classic init could not for example give a list of running services. And systemd is far more flexible and feature rich than Window's options now. systemd-boot and timedated on the other hand are pretty darn disconnected from anything a classic init system was concerned with. It does feel like a lot of the non service/mount management parts of systemd are basically a grab bag of random stuff.