3 ms·
How would a team of independent reviewers even go about examining source code of this scale? How can you possibly find bugs that aren't super obvious?
by johnnyfived 6y ago
How would a team of independent reviewers even go about examining source code of this scale? How can you possibly find bugs that aren't super obvious?
- pavel_lishin 6y ago> How would a team of independent reviewers even go about examining source code of this scale? How can you possibly find bugs that aren't super obvious? Something tells me that 170k of Matlab code is going to contain plenty of obvious bugs.
- twobitshifter 6y agoThe defense team only needs to provide the jury with a reasonable doubt. They don’t have to prove that it’s entirely wrong, only the existence of mistakes that call into question the overall accuracy. The founder has already made their argument for them by claiming that the entire codebase is impossible to review. “since a complete review is not possible, we reviewed a sample of x files and found y errors in the code. It is obvious that the developers has not adhered to the strict software code quality review standards that are necessary when dealing with life and death situations.”