> I don't accept that we're bound by the definitions in that law when we're discussing potential new policy Here's a recent Assault Weapons Ban by Diane Feinst

> I don't accept that we're bound by the definitions in that law when we're discussing potential new policy Here's a recent Assault Weapons Ban by Diane Feinstein, 2020, not the result of political lobbying. It takes your statement to heart. Do you see any holes in this one being effective? I do. >the result of intensive lobbying by groups like the NRA and represents a capitulation from the original position of gun reformers Every bill will be the result of lobbying and ideas from competing groups, and will result in compromise. That's not such a bad thing. Not every American wants either extreme that political parties can concoct. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/66 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/66