I posit that freedom 0 of the free software definition can be interpreted to mean that one can not just not use a specific piece of software, but even make use

I posit that freedom 0 of the free software definition can be interpreted to mean that one can not just not use a specific piece of software, but even make use of alternatives if they're better suited for one's purpose. Pretending that freedom of choice about what people spend their free time on is "an unfortunate side effect", is what represents a "toxic" attitude in my opinion.