4 ms·
Are you intentionally missing that the point is the fact that any one of them can use the portable init system that isn't systemd? > No, they should turn syste
by tal8d 6y ago
Are you intentionally missing that the point is the fact that any one of them can use the portable init system that isn't systemd?
> No, they should turn systemd into a real standard. ECMAinitd :-p
Well systemd can only work on linux, by design. So every standard compliant init system would require that it package a linux kernel. That is not only moronic, but with history as our guide: would directly result in never patched, network active, embedded software.