What is "ownership"? What are "rights"? Is there something ‘real’ behind either one, and if so, what? What is the "proper logic" that gets me arrested should I

What is "ownership"? What are "rights"? Is there something ‘real’ behind either one, and if so, what? What is the "proper logic" that gets me arrested should I hike on unimproved private lands in the US, but not in Finland? > and is it worth protecting like ‘a saint cow’ with enormous efforts. There are many arguments on many sides about this topic. See the arguments concerning Sci-Hub for just one nexus. Or the arguments to the US Library of Congress for what should be excluded from certain parts of copyright protection. Or the arguments for the right-to-repair. Or the discussions about copyright legislation. One of the arguments for copyright-as-a-concept is that it encourages "creativity of individuals in society". One of the arguments against copyright-as-it's-currently-implement is that it discourages that creativity. I can't tell from what you've written if you are arguing the former or the latter of these two, or perhaps something else entirely.