3 ms·
About a week after the US invasion of Iraq happened, something which New Yorker editor David Remnick heavily pushed, the magazine ran a 10000+ word hit piece on
by Context_free 6y ago
About a week after the US invasion of Iraq happened, something which New Yorker editor David Remnick heavily pushed, the magazine ran a 10000+ word hit piece on anti-war critic (and theory of computation Chomsky Normal Form creator) Noam Chomsky
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/03/31/the-devils-accountant https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2003/03/31/the-devils-acc...
To pull one thing from this long article - one of the thousands of petitions Chomsky signed over the years was one regarding a French professor named Robert Faurisson. The piece's author wrote:
"Robert Faurisson was a professor of French literature at the University of Lyon-2, in France, who had been suspended from his teaching duties after a mob of students protested his denials of the Holocaust."
This is correct, but something is left out. Faurisson was threatened with prison as well. In fact he got a suspended prison sentence. Chomsky said at the time people should not be imprisoned for publishing books. The piece's author excluded this information from the reader. "He is against governments imprisoning people for writing books" doesn't have quite the ring of the two paragraphs the author wrote on the topic.
- rendall 6y agoThese sorts of hit pieces from formerly respectable media have, more than anything else the traditional media have done, chipped away at their credibility for me over the last 2 decades. It has now become my operating assumption that they're lying, to the point that it's difficult for me to communicate about current events with people who look to newspapers for a source of truth. Our operating assumptions are so different.