What a bunch of ideological cr*p. All you need to know about this is the author puts the word science in climate science in quotation marks. Or makes a "highly

What a bunch of ideological cr*p. All you need to know about this is the author puts the word science in climate science in quotation marks. Or makes a "highly reasoned" point about redistribution: "Redistribution, by definition anti-merit,...". I presume fire/flood insurance is also anti-merit by this guy's standards. Notwithstanding all that, I have issues with some college admission practices for example, but it has to be reasoned with facts and rational discussion, not with a political zeal.