3 ms·
> this leak AFAICS it's not a leak, but a regular freedom of information request. And I'm not too familiar with how German media works, but if it's anything li
by Vinnl 6y ago
> this leak
AFAICS it's not a leak, but a regular freedom of information request. And I'm not too familiar with how German media works, but if it's anything like the Dutch national broadcaster, it's not actually the states that are pursuing this, but journalists on their own accord.
- quink 6y agoYou guys need to be careful, having given the responsibility for funding public broadcasting to the government. That’s dangerous.
- StavrosK 6y agoWho funda public broadcasting in the US? Isn't PBS government-funded?
- quink 6y agoPartially. Most of the funding comes from corporate sponsors and individual donors and those tend to be on a station by station or program level. The funding sources for NewsHour, probably the most relevant part of PBS, are listed here for example: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders Which leads to hilarious results like the Koch Brothers funding NOVA. That said, Sinclair and the like excluded, the splintering of television networks into individual markets and restrictions on O-and-O stations are world-class exemplary parts of the US media landscape. Also, what I meant is that put it funding somewhere out of reach of the general taxation pool. Tie it to property taxes, have a licence fee, a foundation with an endowment, a levy on something or other, individual sponsorships, that kind of thing. Tying the funding and thus existence of your media to a healthy democracy is like giving a horse its own rope, they'll trot off into the sunset never to be seen again.
- Vinnl 6y agoTo emphasise, our national broadcasters are not our only broadcasters, so the funding of our media is not dependant on the government. There are commercial broadcasters as well.