4 ms·
Not at all for Starlink. The orbits are low enough to decay within 5-10 years if they are left without station keeping. Remember, "space" does not start at the
by Gwypaas 6y ago
Not at all for Starlink. The orbits are low enough to decay within 5-10 years if they are left without station keeping. Remember, "space" does not start at the karman line, it is a continuous transition. Although, they have a license for satellites at ~1100 km altitude. Those would need active deorbiting.
The Starlink satellites are also designed to completely burn up in the atmosphere. This is one of the reasons why the first generation does not have laser-links, that was supposedly the hardest part to design fulfilling that criteria.
That's actually one of the advantages of their proposed lowering of the orbits, they need to think even less about end of life questions and redundancy.
Edit: See here for the continuous sweeping happening at lower orbits.
https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/ld4vlq/gabbard_diagram_animation_of_space_debris_since/ https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/ld4vlq/gabbard_diagr...
- blisterpeanuts 6y agoThe Starlink sats are also specifically designed to be forcibly de-orbited at end-of-life, rather than remain as space junk for however long.[1] 1. starlink.com
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- m463 6y agoThey want to lower those satellites to ~550km which seems to me to be significantly less likely to leave space junk around.