3 ms·

Tree notation looks fun... I was reading what I think is the spec (https://github.com/treenotation/blog.treenotation.org/blob/master/liber-simplicitas.md https:

Tree notation looks fun... I was reading what I think is the spec (https://github.com/treenotation/blog.treenotation.org/blob/master/liber-simplicitas.md https://github.com/treenotation/blog.treenotation.org/blob/m...)? I honestly can't make quite heads or tails of it, but I do get an sense that giving cells 2D size is important. Then I looked at the language examples and... none of them seem to really use this idea of cell size?? Am I missing something?

breck 6y ago
> Am I missing something? Nope! That's a keen observation. The 2 and 3 dimension stuff is still coming. That's when Tree Notation starts to get really interesting. Here's one recent example of a 2-d thingy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn2aJA5ANUc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vn2aJA5ANUc The beauty of this stuff as it gets going as all of these seemingly simple langs will be able to take advantage of the 2d and 3d stuff. I always stretch myself thin, but I'm starting to see other people do really cool things with this concept of 2 and 3 dimensional languages, an area of research that has been really quiet for ~50 years. If anyone is interested I'm telling ya I still can't see the limit! :)_