The problem with this test is that it's clear that people can commit enough resources to solve almost any one particular problem with "AI". If people are willin

The problem with this test is that it's clear that people can commit enough resources to solve almost any one particular problem with "AI". If people are willing to pay tens or hundreds of millions of dollars they can create an AI system that can play any game (chess,jeopardy,go), fold proteins, drive a car, etc. The obvious problem is that no one AI system can do all of those tasks. Every human mind is able to do all of those things and literally infinitely many others. All for a cost of waaaaay below what DeepMind paid to learn to play Atari. If a problem involves the organization of information, "AI" can solve it. I think we've established that. I'm waiting to see something that humans can't already do