4 ms·
Because lobbying is currently a solution, not a problem. While we see that it causes problems, formal lobbying structures were set up specifically so that we ca
by bberenberg 6y ago
Because lobbying is currently a solution, not a problem. While we see that it causes problems, formal lobbying structures were set up specifically so that we can see what is happening. Without the framework we have today, it happens anyways but more in backrooms with less oversight. For example, if instead of formal meetings where FOI requests can get access to documents like listed on the website, this was all done at someones home at a private dinner would we the general public be better off?
To be clear, I agree that we need to improve the situation, however ignoring that lobbying is better than what came before it isn't particularly helpful. Influence is a core component of social power structures. You can't legislate it away.
- sdoering 6y agoAs discussed in the Frontex papers, the problem here is, that Frontex does not even comply with EU lobbying regulations. They go around them as if these just don't apply to them. So even if there are regulations in place, as long as institutions not facing dire consequences for noncompliance, the rational thing to do as a member of such an institution is to ignore said regulations. As long as the negative consequences of your actions are minimal at best while some form of positive consequences are very likely, why comply with regulations.
- bberenberg 6y agoI absolutely agree. And we need to do better in terms of enforcement. What I was trying to convey was that by formally allowing lobbying it gives us more power to do something about it. Same reasoning for why drug legalization works better than prohibition.
- sdoering 6y agoAbsolutely. And the lobby register is a step in the right direction. Albeit be it a small one. More steps need to follow and strong enforcement.