The irony of using corn markets as an analogy when they are the most subsidised industry in America is lost on him. At the end of the day this has always been a

The irony of using corn markets as an analogy when they are the most subsidised industry in America is lost on him. At the end of the day this has always been a question of who 'deserves' what, dismissed by people like the author saying the concept of 'deserving' isn't real, while staring squarely in the face an industry that someone decided deserves a subsidy. If the concept of deserving wasn't real and people were simply paid according what they bring to the table, we would live in a utopia.