5 ms·
I'd hoped that aarch64 (ARM) would now be a tier 1 architecture in 13 but that's not to be the case (https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ https://www.freebsd.org/
by octofish 6y ago
I'd hoped that aarch64 (ARM) would now be a tier 1 architecture in 13 but that's not to be the case (https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ https://www.freebsd.org/platforms/) and the FreeBSD wiki page on what's required to make aarch64 a Tier 1 architecture was flagged as being out of date ~18 months ago (https://wiki.freebsd.org/ARMTier1 https://wiki.freebsd.org/ARMTier1).
For info, a key thing about Tier 1 architectures is that "Binary updates and source patches for Security Advisories and Errata Notices will be provided for supported releases" (https://docs.freebsd.org/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/archs.html https://docs.freebsd.org/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers...), which would make maintaining ARM-based SBCs much easier (no need for setting up cross-compilation toolchains or for very slow compilation on the SBCs) and could make FreeBSD an even better OS for IoT stuff.
- mnd999 6y agoIt is enormously disappointing to have to wait yet another cycle for officially supported updates on aarch64. For a relatively well funded project, FreeBSD should be able to meet this kind of goal and they should be asking what went wrong here and how they can improve.
- petre 6y agoProbably not enough developers motivated enough to work on aarch64. Maybe if Nvidia and/or another Arm64 hardware vendor was a sponsor OTOH things would be different. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2019-December/019810.html https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2019-Decemb...