4 ms·
Alright, so then $43k to compete, given typical Elon Musk numbers. Still a hard bar!
by reissbaker 6y ago
Alright, so then $43k to compete, given typical Elon Musk numbers. Still a hard bar!
- alphabettsy 6y agoNot sure how you figure. The one that will actually be available at launch and I’m guessing most people will buy, with AWD, is $50k.
- nickik 6y agoThis is a terrible argument. Of any car most people don't buy the base version. People wont buy the base version of an F-150 either. And just because Tesla once didn't offer a car with the price they said doesn't mean its some inherent law of nature. Tesla now is a very different company compared to 2017 when they built their first mass manufactured car. Fact is that Electric F-150 will not be able to compete with the Cybertruck on specs. Tesla will bring its now batteries and new packs and will reach range and performance that F-150 can't match.
- alphabettsy 6y agoLook. I’m not the person who brought up the 35k Model 3. I was pointing out that the absolute base car and base trim is a silly metric. They don’t have to compete with the base model. They can compete with the volume model. If they match it on specs and features it’s competitive. Tesla marketing has a habit of being very ambitious so we’ll see if the range and performance are better in the real-world. They certainly have the technology and battery advantage.
- pmorici 6y agoCan you cite any car company that makes the cheapest version of a product available before the more expensive one? It makes good business sense to start with the more profitable model I’m not sure why you bring this up as if it is bad.
- jfim 6y agoThe Mustang Mach-E GT and Mach-E GT Performance Edition aren't available until summer 2021 but the lower trim levels are available right now.
- alphabettsy 6y agoI’m not the one that brought up that lowest priced Model 3.