4 ms·
> ... they're really anal about defending their trademark, because that's pretty much all they have left. A quick search turns up reporting Lego as a close sec
by seneca 6y ago
> ... they're really anal about defending their trademark, because that's pretty much all they have left.
A quick search turns up reporting Lego as a close second for highest revenue of a toy company worldwide.
> Namco Bandai was the industry leader with the highest revenue at over 6.6 billion U.S. dollars ... Danish company Lego, known for its interlocking plastic bricks, closely followed Namco Bandai with over 5.78 billion U.S. dollars in revenue.
https://www.statista.com/topics/1108/toy-industry/ https://www.statista.com/topics/1108/toy-industry/
- chmod775 6y ago> A quick search turns up reporting Lego as a close second for highest revenue of a toy company worldwide. Yes. And? How is that in any way a response? They're making money because they're using their brand/trademark to sell inferior products for twice the price of their competition. You can take any LEGO product and compare it to what the competition is offering, typically it'll look like this: The LEGO product has half the parts or costs twice the money and when you actually have both of them next to other you'll think LEGO must be joking. Example: CADA Master C61042W vs. LEGO Technic 42125 So because they can't compete on the product front, they go with lawyers after reviewers. For example after this German channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_EZd3lsmxudu3IQzpTzOgw https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_EZd3lsmxudu3IQzpTzOgw