3 ms·
Yeah 1 in 200 is well within the realm of abuse stats though it's still really speculative to try to assign a cause for a blip in the data. No idea what contr
by Enginerrrd 6y ago
Yeah 1 in 200 is well within the realm of abuse stats though it's still really speculative to try to assign a cause for a blip in the data. No idea what controls they used, but I can't imagine there is much for statistical significance there.
- Wowfunhappy 6y agoI think that was OP's point though. At these numbers, "this is much ado over almost nothing."
- Enginerrrd 6y agoI agree wholeheartedly, but not so much with OP's second part trying to speculate over a cause.