4 ms·
The human readable form was done by attaching an XSLT to an rss.xml file. That's still 100% do-able, people just stopped doing it.
by tylerchilds 6y ago
The human readable form was done by attaching an XSLT to an rss.xml file. That's still 100% do-able, people just stopped doing it.
- toyg 6y agoI believe quite a few browsers don't ship an xslt-capable engine anymore.
- cxr 6y agoIf you haven't verified this, you're engaging in uninformed (and potentially harmful) speculation.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- thotsBgone 6y agoNo comment about browser rss-feeds can be meaningfully harmful.
- cxr 6y agoIt's an uninformed comment about XSLT support being removed from browsers—not "about browser rss-feeds". Misinformation about something as consequential as that definitely has the potential to cause a non-zero amount of harm if people take it at face value.
- aww_dang 6y agoWorks in Chrome. Adding XSLT to your sitemaps/feeds will cause Google to index them in search.
- mro_name 6y agoI use that heavily at https://demo.mro.name/shaarligo https://demo.mro.name/shaarligo. The provider of the feed could/should just ship it alongside. P.S.: I prefer atom/RFC4287 for being well-defined and with e.g. sane dates.
- account42 6y ago> About link rel='about' missing. link rel='license' missing. § Imprint link rel='terms-of-service' missing. Privacy link rel='terms-of-service' missing. ShaarliGo