6 ms·
It took me years to find this, but here’s a summary: https://www.ghacks.net/2018/07/25/mozilla-plans-to-remove-rss-feed-reader-and-live-bookmarks-support-from-
by clankyclanker 6y ago
It took me years to find this, but here’s a summary:
https://www.ghacks.net/2018/07/25/mozilla-plans-to-remove-rss-feed-reader-and-live-bookmarks-support-from-firefox/ https://www.ghacks.net/2018/07/25/mozilla-plans-to-remove-rs...
In short, updating the feature to competitive UX and security expectations wouldn’t have been worth the effort based on the usage numbers.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- dingaling 6y agoIt's frustrating how Mozilla will use usage statistics as justification to kill a feature, whilst at the same time using nagging UI prompts to promote underperforming corporate decisions like Pocket and FFSync. Perhaps they should have a rule that any feature proposed for deletion should be promoted equally aggressively for six months. If usage still doesn't increase then remove it.
- Mandatum 6y agoTrue, I think third-party RSS readers are always going to be better though. Integration with specific partners and vendors makes RSS accessible. Mozilla would have developed something great, but it would have been tied to Mozilla products and services..
- account42 6y ago> Integration with specific partners and vendors makes RSS accessible. wat
- ampdepolymerase 6y agoThey should learn from Brave and replace the RSS native ads with their own.
- Kwpolska 6y agoBrowser sync is a fairly crucial feature for many users who have multiple devices, or even just dual-boot. Or who want a backup of their bookmarks and history.
- SecurityLagoon 6y agoI don't care about a competitive UX for the in browser support. Just something that vagually renders the XML as something readable with a button to add to reader of choice. Even just leaving the old address bar icon indicating there is a feed available would be nice.