> No, it really isn't. Disinformation is spreading factually wrong information to push an agenda. Who are you arguing against here? A strawman? It's almost as

> No, it really isn't. Disinformation is spreading factually wrong information to push an agenda. Who are you arguing against here? A strawman? It's almost as if you just read the headline and you didn't read the article. > By positioning the two as equivalent the author engages in disinformation The author never calls them equivalent. Maybe you're trying to be clever with your "positions them" wording. More likely though, you didn't bother to read the article. You saying this is disinformation.