2 ms·

With respect, you are speaking from ignorance. NLP arouses the ire of what I call "Capital-S Skeptics". That's why I didn't link to the Wikipedia article on i

With respect, you are speaking from ignorance. NLP arouses the ire of what I call "Capital-S Skeptics". That's why I didn't link to the Wikipedia article on it, as it's been glossed over with cries of "pseudo-science!" by ignorant skeptics so you can't really get any information about NLP from WP except that skeptics are skeptical of it. I have personal experience of NLP and I can vouch that it is effective (you can change yourself quickly and easily) and rigorous (it develops repeatable algorithms that can be taught to others who can then replicate the results), e.g. the "Phobia Cure" pattern that cures phobias quickly and permanently typically in a single application. I myself was cured of a terrible depression that was ruining my life in a one-off treatment that took less than ten minutes. Saved my life.

tsimionescu 6y ago
> I myself was cured of a terrible depression that was ruining my life in a one-off treatment that took less than ten minutes. Saved my life. Having known many people who struggle with depression, please allow me to simply consider you a liar on this point at least. It is claims like this that make it obvious that NLP is either culty or snake-oil (or both). Claiming that you can cure complex diseases with neurological and social and psychological causes in 10 minutes with repeatable algorithms inspired by applying linguistic analysis on the work of 3 therapists is so obviously bunk that I'm wondering if you'll next tell me about this one weird trick if I send you a one-off payment.