2 ms·
My understanding is that this story was run through the New York Times fact checking department. Is that not the equivalent of testing?
by madrox 6y ago
My understanding is that this story was run through the New York Times fact checking department. Is that not the equivalent of testing?
- zepto 6y agoIf that is what happened, then I agree. My understanding is that the fact checking department exists, and that Mills was told he didn’t need to do his own fact checking. But it wasn’t clear to me that the fact checking department did the fact checking. In this situation, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to expect Mills to be responsible for making sure the fact checking has been done before considering his work ready for publication even if he wasn’t the one doing it. Just like a release engineer may be responsible for making sure the release has been through QA.